MOUSE COMPUTER A compact "MOUSE CT6" and Ryzen 5 4500U with a thinability of about 28mm, and the high performance that is unlikely to be a small PC is attractive.
The "MOUSE CT6", which is almost A5 size and about 28mm, is equipped with a Ryzen 5 4500U on the CPU, and is characterized by its compact body that can be used so powerfully that it cannot be imagined.Last time, I mainly looked at the interface and appearance, but this time I will check my ability.
The CPU is for notebooks, but it has a rich configuration of 6 core / 6 threads, which is inferior to the high -end desktop five years ago.The appeal of Ryzen 5 4500U is that not only the CPU but also the built -in GPU is high performance.Check out how well it is with some benchmark software.
The front.Hair line processing is applied to blend into the living room.
The back is also finished with hairline processing
mouse CT6の主なスペック | |
---|---|
CPU | AMD「Ryzen 5 4500U」 (6コア/6スレッド、2.3~4.0GHz) |
グラフィックス | AMD Radeon グラフィックス (6コア、1500MHz) |
メモリー | 8GB |
ストレージ | 256GB SSD(M.2/SATA) |
通信規格 | 無線LAN(IEEE802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax)、Bluetooth 5 |
インターフェース | HDMI出力、D-Sub 15ピン、USB 3.0 Type-C、USB 3.0 Type-A×2、USB 2.0×2、マルチカードリーダー、ギガビットLAN、ヘッドフォン出力、マイク入力 |
サイズ/重量 | およそ幅28×奥行150×高さ194mm/約749g(スタンド装着時) |
OS | Microsoft「Windows 10 Home」(64ビット) |
First, check performance with 8GB of memory, which is the standard configuration
As mentioned above, the standard configuration specifications are Ryzen 5 4500U, 8GB memory, 256GB SSD.There is a potential that can be used enough to create documents with Office software, enjoy web browsing, enjoy videos, and use it for a little photo development.
Use "HWINFO" to check the information on CPU and GPU."Ryzen 5 4500U" is a model that combines 6 core / 6 thread Zen2 and 6 core Radeon Graphics.
Let's look at a part of its performance with some benchmark software.The software used is the comprehensive benchmark "PCMark 10", the CPU performance benchmark "Cinebench R23", the 3D graphic performance benchmark "3DMARK", the game performance benchmark "Final Fantasy XIV: Jet Black Villains Venchmark" (FFXIV bench),And there are five types of storage benchmark "CrystalDiskMark".The 3DMark tested two tests: "Fire Strike" of DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 "Time Spy".Let's look at the results in order.
The score of "PCMark 10" is 4447.Although it is a little inferior to the tower type desktop, it hits the performance that is unlikely to be a small PC.
The score of "Cinebench R23" is 5354PTS for multi -threaded CPU and 1176pts for single thread CPU (Single Core).I have the ability to approach high -end PCs about 5 years ago
Of "3DMark", Fire Strike is the test of DirectX 11.The score is 1774 and the evaluation is "good", but it is low for its built -in Radeon.
Time Spy, a test of DirectX 12 out of "3DMark".The score is 704 and the evaluation is "good", but this was not expensive.
"FFXIV bench" is executed on 1920 x 1080, highest quality, full screen.The score is 1455 and the evaluation is "needed to change the settings", which is strict.
"CrystalDiskMark" (8.0.The storage performance by 1) is a sequential of about 490MB / second, and a light of about 490MB / sec.It's not super fast because it's a SATA connection, but it's not as slow as I feel stressed
Looking at the overall performance, it can be seen that it is quite high performance as a small PC, and if it does not perform quite heavy processing such as 4K video editing, it can be used without any complaints.
However, there are some parts that are worrisome.What I was particularly worried about was the graphic performance, not only 3DMark but also the results of the FF14 bench.If you don't play games, you don't have to worry, but the AMD CPU has a high built -in graphic performance, so it's a bit out of beat for those who expected.
In fact, there is a reason for this.Please look closely at the memory information part of "HWINFO" which you checked earlier.
If you look closely at the memory information, you can see that it is written as "Single-Channel".
The standard configuration is 8GB of memory, but it is actually 8GB x 1 sheet.Therefore, there are only half of the dual channel used at the same time.
If it is only a general CPU processing, the performance is not so bad even with a single channel, but the built -in GPU uses a part of the main memory as a graphic memory, so the narrower the bandwidth, the more performance it will be.。
So, I added the 8GB memory that was at hand, changed it to 8GB x 2 configurations, and retracted the bench.The speed of the added memory is DDR4-19200.Since the standard installation is DDR4-21300, the speed is slightly lower in terms of speed.
Added 8GB memory at hand and changed to a total of 16GB configuration of 8GB x 2.I checked how well the performance changes
Add a memory and check the performance with 8GB x 2 pieces
The conditions are exactly the same, and let's look at the benchmark results with 8GB x 2 sheets.However, the storage speed has been omitted because there was almost no change.
The score of "PCMark 10" has been uploaded from 4447 to 4702.The score is increasing slightly overall, and it seems that not only 3D performance but also pure drawing performance has been improved slightly.
The score of "Cinebench R23" has changed from 5354PTS to 5343PTS for multi -threaded CPUs, and single thread CPU (Single Core) from 1176PTS to 1165PTS.Although the memory speed has decreased slightly, it has been slightly lowered, but it will be within the error.
In the "3DMark" Fire Strike, the score has been greatly increased from 1774 to 2701.The evaluation will be "Excellent", indicating that Radeon's ability is demonstrated.
"3DMark" Time Spy also has a score from 704 to 1020.It is certain that the narrowness of the memory band was pulling his feet
The "FFXIV bench" score is from 1455 to 2380.The evaluation is also "normal", and if it is a light game, it will change to a level that can be played with a full HD.
Even if the total memory capacity is doubled, the score of 3DMark and FFXIV benches is large, even if it is affected.Also, since the performance of the general graphics is raised, there is no reason not to make the memory a dual channel configuration, although there is little effect on the CPU performance.
Although it is a practical performance even with the standard configuration, it is recommended that you purchase this configuration from the beginning, as it will be faster if the memory is made into a dual channel.Unlike over -the -counter sales models, the biggest attraction is that direct sales BTO PCs can be changed to your favorite specifications from the beginning.In addition, Mouse CT6 unlike ordinary tower -type personal computers, does not prere to enhance the specifications later, so if you reinforce your memory yourself, it may be out of warranty.High and be careful.If you are worried, I would recommend adding it in BTO from the beginning.
You can choose not only the standard 8GB x 1 sheet, but also 4GB x 2 to 32GB x 2 sheets, so it is a good idea to increase it to the required capacity.Recently, the amount of software usage has increased, so it is safe to keep a total of 16GB or more.
In addition, the speed of the storage is improved when the storage is speeded up, so if you select the SSD that is as fast as possible, you will be more satisfying.If you value speed, it is recommended to use NVME compatible PCIE connection instead of SATA connection.The capacity can also be selected from 256GB to 1TB.
Recommended for a living PC or a personal computer for your own
"MOUSE CT6" is a compact performance that can be used firmly and can further enhance the performance depending on the customization.It can be said that the tower type is perfect for those who think that there is no place to place, but also those who are looking for a PC for their own and children through work and study.