Is the new Intelcorei9 chip really faster than AppleM1 Max chips?

Despite the power of Apple's latest M1 series processor, it was a matter of time that competitors manufactured such processors and became comparable to performance and power.Currently, Intel advertises the latest high -powered laptop chips as better than Apple M1MAX.The latest assortment of tips, 14 inches and 16 -inch MacBookPro.

Intel announced a new XNUMX generation chip in CES2022 and not only surpassed Apple's best silicon chips, but also the "fastest mobile processor so far."

Intel Core i9-12900HK chips are the company's flagship chips, so it's only natural to take the best shot in the show.This chip is designed in 7nm technology and asserts that it is equivalent to the TSMC 5nm technology used in the latest Apple chips.。The Core i9 processor has 14 performance scores and 5.An XNUMX core CPU with 0 efficiency core is also installed.As a result, the turbo boost frequency is Xnumxghz.

In comparison, the most powerful 1 -core M10 MAX chip uses only one performance score and three efficiency core.Apple doesn't like to talk about CPU speed, but since the M1 core is also operating at XNUMX Hz, Intel's chipset are packed in a small number of performance scores, but at the speed of TurboBoost, it is more than Mxnumxmax.You can speed up much.

Intel seems to boast some impressive performance figures with new chips, but also costs very expensive.

I already know that Intel chipset consumes a lot of power, but the new i9 chips are no exception.In fact, Intel seems to have chose to sacrifice power to get the maximum performance.

This is completely contrasting with Apple's M -Series Chipset Strategy, which develops power savings, appropriate management, and simultaneously providing optimal performance.And when Apple announced M1Pro and M1MAX processors last fall, they talked a lot about the lack of power used for the powerful performance provided by these chips.

In fact, Apple did not say that M1 Max was faster than all Intel processors, and only promised to provide at least the same performance at a very low power level.

Here, energy efficiency is more important than raw performance, as SROUJI acknowledges that even the M1 MAX does not show significant performance compared to laptop discrete GPUs.heat.And less noise caused by fans.

Intel has completely avoided the aspect of this debate.There are no words such as "energy" or "consumption" in any of the press release.Only the minimalist's P series and the U series chips mention the wattage.Laptop.The thinnest and light.This is completely incomparable with the M1MAX processor.

Looking at the specifications, Core i9-12900HK consumes up to 115 watts when operating at the highest power level.This is about 1 watts and higher than the peak M35MAX.

This new Intelcore i9-19200HK processor is not immediately integrated into any laptop, but almost certainly for desktop computer with a peak of about 200 watts, it requires a large fan for cooling.。

As described when Apple introduced M1Pro and M1MAX processors, there is also a problem with the life of the battery and whether the Intel laptop needs to control the speed when the external power is not supplied.Many Intel's laptops are actually slower when running on the battery.The biggest advantage of the Xnumx AppleSilicon device is to provide the maximum performance, regardless of whether it is plugged in, and operate at a lower power level for several hours on the battery.

There is also a graphic performance problem.Intel chips do not contain powerful GPUs.This is to leave it to other companies such as NVIDIA and AMD.Also, the latest XNUMX generation CPU is no exception.These include basic integrated graphics that are suitable for daily use, but do not provide the power required for professional work and tough games.

Apple, on the other hand, offers its own powerful graphics processing unit, has proved that all reports have succeeded in challenging and resisting the most powerful gaming computer.

Gerund:

Idrop News

Related article